Talk:Diamond, Pearl and what beyond?: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Vash Aurion (talk | contribs) (New page: Diamond and Pearl does seem like an appropriate end to the main series, mostly due to the presence of Arceus. The legendaries have traditionally built up and up and up, but there isn't a r...) |
Vash Aurion (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Diamond and Pearl does seem like an appropriate end to the main series, mostly due to the presence of Arceus. The legendaries have traditionally built up and up and up, but there isn't a real way to build past the Pokemon equivalent of god. That said, Pokemon is such a powerful franchise that it would be ridiculous for Nintendo to not continue it. It'll be interesting to see what happens. | '''Article Discussion Page''' | ||
---- | |||
Diamond and Pearl does seem like an appropriate end to the main series, mostly due to the presence of Arceus. The legendaries have traditionally built up and up and up, but there isn't a real way to build past the Pokemon equivalent of god. That said, Pokemon is such a powerful franchise that it would be ridiculous for Nintendo to not continue it. It'll be interesting to see what happens.--[[User:Vash Aurion|Vash Aurion]] 21:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 26 May 2007
Article Discussion Page
Diamond and Pearl does seem like an appropriate end to the main series, mostly due to the presence of Arceus. The legendaries have traditionally built up and up and up, but there isn't a real way to build past the Pokemon equivalent of god. That said, Pokemon is such a powerful franchise that it would be ridiculous for Nintendo to not continue it. It'll be interesting to see what happens.--Vash Aurion 21:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
