Talk:New blister pack announced: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Dragon type link: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:ToyWiz has the higher quality, non edited image. Your statement is hard, maybe even impossible, to prove. Not that I don't believe, just be aware of what it looks like from the outside. One site has their name all over an image, another has no trace of themselves over it. There's a one directional relationship there. [[User:Maverick Nate|Maverick Nate]] ([[User talk:Maverick Nate|talk]]) 07:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | :ToyWiz has the higher quality, non edited image. Your statement is hard, maybe even impossible, to prove. Not that I don't believe, just be aware of what it looks like from the outside. One site has their name all over an image, another has no trace of themselves over it. There's a one directional relationship there. [[User:Maverick Nate|Maverick Nate]] ([[User talk:Maverick Nate|talk]]) 07:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Dragon type link == | |||
It should link to [[Dragon (TCG)]], not [[Dragon (type)]]. --[[User:Flicky|Flicky]] ([[User talk:Flicky|talk]]) 21:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:43, 1 September 2012
This was officially announced by PokeCollection on Facebook, not ToyWiz. たかはりい 07:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- ToyWiz has the higher quality, non edited image. Your statement is hard, maybe even impossible, to prove. Not that I don't believe, just be aware of what it looks like from the outside. One site has their name all over an image, another has no trace of themselves over it. There's a one directional relationship there. Maverick Nate (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Dragon type link
It should link to Dragon (TCG), not Dragon (type). --Flicky (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
