Talk:On the Origin of Species: Chinchou and Lanturn: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Xan Hutcheon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*In the seventh paragraph, wouldn't it be "one of the most common family of angler fish," not commonest families? --[[User:Crimsonnavy|Crimsonnavy]] 18:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | *In the seventh paragraph, wouldn't it be "one of the most common family of angler fish," not commonest families? --[[User:Crimsonnavy|Crimsonnavy]] 18:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Not quite sure what you're getting at. I've scanned the sentence again and it looks grammatical to me... [[User:George Hutcheon|George Hutcheon]] 19:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | ::Not quite sure what you're getting at. I've scanned the sentence again and it looks grammatical to me... [[User:George Hutcheon|George Hutcheon]] 19:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I would like to request an edit to this page removing the evolution references. While I understand that many people accept the concept of evolution, not everyone does, and to a Christian like me, it is offensive. I would like to request that the pages at least remain impartial in what views they post. Thanks. --[[User:Jeikobu|Jeikobu]] 18:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:24, 11 September 2010
- In the seventh paragraph, wouldn't it be "one of the most common family of angler fish," not commonest families? --Crimsonnavy 18:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite sure what you're getting at. I've scanned the sentence again and it looks grammatical to me... George Hutcheon 19:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- I would like to request an edit to this page removing the evolution references. While I understand that many people accept the concept of evolution, not everyone does, and to a Christian like me, it is offensive. I would like to request that the pages at least remain impartial in what views they post. Thanks. --Jeikobu 18:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)