Talk:PKMN.NET reports HG/SS will include Kanto: Difference between revisions

From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Minor complaint)
 
m (we don't have to put it everywhere)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Nothing major, but LeafGreen and FireRed? Fans know them as the other way around, so it may be best to rewrite that line. Don't bother unless there is more important stuff to add though; I've heard BulbaBot does his head in if you edit a published article. &mdash; <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] &mdash; 21:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Nothing major, but LeafGreen and FireRed? Fans know them as the other way around, so it may be best to rewrite that line. Don't bother unless there is more important stuff to add though; I've heard BulbaBot does his head in if you edit a published article. &mdash; <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] &mdash; 21:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
:I agree. Someone should change that.--[[User:Pokelova|<span style="color:#FF0000;">''I'm Pokelova''</span>]][[User talk:Pokelova|<sup style="font-family:Vivaldi"><sup style="color:#FF0000;"><big>''(Talk)''</big></sup></sup>]] 22:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
::It rolls off the tongue better for me, but BulbaBot already snagged it.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#9A2EFE">a.k.a.</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' was here at 23:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
:::"Fans have been speculating if this will be included, '''due to LeafGreen and FireRed including the region'''." How wrong is that? FireRed and LeafGreen had Kanto becuase they were remakes of Red, Green, and Blue which take place in Kanto. Fans have been expectung it to be int he game because GOLD, SILVER, and CRYSTAL included it. --[[User:HoennMaster|HoennMaster]] 03:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
::::See, a lot of fans were wondering if it were to be in it due to FR/LG. If there was no FR/LG, then there wouldn't be as much speculation.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#9A2EFE">a.k.a.</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' was here at 12:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:59, 17 June 2009

Minor complaint

Nothing major, but LeafGreen and FireRed? Fans know them as the other way around, so it may be best to rewrite that line. Don't bother unless there is more important stuff to add though; I've heard BulbaBot does his head in if you edit a published article. — THE TROM — 21:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Someone should change that.--I'm Pokelova(Talk) 22:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
It rolls off the tongue better for me, but BulbaBot already snagged it.--Mew a.k.a. Prmatt11 was here at 23:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
"Fans have been speculating if this will be included, due to LeafGreen and FireRed including the region." How wrong is that? FireRed and LeafGreen had Kanto becuase they were remakes of Red, Green, and Blue which take place in Kanto. Fans have been expectung it to be int he game because GOLD, SILVER, and CRYSTAL included it. --HoennMaster 03:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
See, a lot of fans were wondering if it were to be in it due to FR/LG. If there was no FR/LG, then there wouldn't be as much speculation.--Mew a.k.a. Prmatt11 was here at 12:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)