Bulbagraphic talk:Front Page: Difference between revisions
(→Really?: reply) |
(→Soooo...: new section) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Isn't this a ''monthly'' publication? Not semi-''yearly''? [[User:Pringles|Pringles]] ([[User talk:Pringles|talk]]) 23:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | Isn't this a ''monthly'' publication? Not semi-''yearly''? [[User:Pringles|Pringles]] ([[User talk:Pringles|talk]]) 23:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:This project has been discontinued for the time being. No one on staff, regrettably, has time to run it at the moment. There's too much else going on. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana">[[bp:User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#000">darklord</span>]][[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 08:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | :This project has been discontinued for the time being. No one on staff, regrettably, has time to run it at the moment. There's too much else going on. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana">[[bp:User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#000">darklord</span>]][[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 08:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Should we remove National Bulbagraphic forever or should we update it? == | |||
It's offical. Pretty much no one visits that page forever. I mean, c'mon, the last issue was in 2011 FOR F***'S SAKE!! Should we have a poll to remove the page forever or reboot the page or just leave it and say, "Who gives a crap?" Outdated means outdated. If we DO delete it for good, we would also have to make an archive of National Bulbagraphic, or just make a dedication to it. A person once said: "If it's updated, it is safe for keeping. If it can't be updated, then archive it or improve it, or if all fails, take it away." [[User:SquadalaGuy|SquadalaGuy]] ([[User talk:SquadalaGuy|talk]]) 3:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Soooo... == | |||
Obviously this has been abandoned. Would it be ok if I just start editing this page to make a new edition? --[[User:Rikeo|<span style="color:Orange">リック</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Rikeo|<span style="color:Purple">EO</span>]] ([[User talk:Rikeo|<span style="color:Grey"><small>Talk</small></span>]]) 07:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:48, 18 August 2015
Print Edition
Is there ever a print edition of this available? If not, can I publish a print edition based on this content? (Not necessarily on behalf of Bulbanews/Bulbagarden)
Alebcay 21:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)alebcay
- Hi! Thanks for the interest, but Bulbagraphic is going to be a web-only enterprise produced solely by Bulbagarden. Please feel free to follow up with me if you have any questions. evkl 02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Alright. Thats OK. I was just checking to make sure I wasn't breaking any rules. Alebcay 23:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)alebcay
Really?
Isn't this a monthly publication? Not semi-yearly? Pringles (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- This project has been discontinued for the time being. No one on staff, regrettably, has time to run it at the moment. There's too much else going on. —darklordtrom 08:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Should we remove National Bulbagraphic forever or should we update it?
It's offical. Pretty much no one visits that page forever. I mean, c'mon, the last issue was in 2011 FOR F***'S SAKE!! Should we have a poll to remove the page forever or reboot the page or just leave it and say, "Who gives a crap?" Outdated means outdated. If we DO delete it for good, we would also have to make an archive of National Bulbagraphic, or just make a dedication to it. A person once said: "If it's updated, it is safe for keeping. If it can't be updated, then archive it or improve it, or if all fails, take it away." SquadalaGuy (talk) 3:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Soooo...
Obviously this has been abandoned. Would it be ok if I just start editing this page to make a new edition? --リック EO (Talk) 07:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
