Talk:New blister pack announced: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "This was officially announced by [http://www.facebook.com/PokeCollection PokeCollection on Facebook], not ToyWiz. ~~~~") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This was officially announced by [http://www.facebook.com/PokeCollection PokeCollection on Facebook], not ToyWiz. [[User:Takharii|<span style="color:#FFD733;">'''たか'''</span>]][[User talk:Takharii|<span style="color:#DAA520;">'''はり'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Takharii|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''い'''</span>]] 07:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | This was officially announced by [http://www.facebook.com/PokeCollection PokeCollection on Facebook], not ToyWiz. [[User:Takharii|<span style="color:#FFD733;">'''たか'''</span>]][[User talk:Takharii|<span style="color:#DAA520;">'''はり'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Takharii|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''い'''</span>]] 07:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
:ToyWiz has the higher quality, non edited image. Your statement is hard, maybe even impossible, to prove. Not that I don't believe, just be aware of what it looks like from the outside. One site has their name all over an image, another has no trace of themselves over it. There's a one directional relationship there. [[User:Maverick Nate|Maverick Nate]] ([[User talk:Maverick Nate|talk]]) 07:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Dragon type link == | |||
It should link to Dragon (TCG), not Dragon (type). --[[User:Flicky|Flicky]] ([[User talk:Flicky|talk]]) 21:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:44, 1 September 2012
This was officially announced by PokeCollection on Facebook, not ToyWiz. たかはりい 07:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- ToyWiz has the higher quality, non edited image. Your statement is hard, maybe even impossible, to prove. Not that I don't believe, just be aware of what it looks like from the outside. One site has their name all over an image, another has no trace of themselves over it. There's a one directional relationship there. Maverick Nate (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Dragon type link
It should link to Dragon (TCG), not Dragon (type). --Flicky (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)