Talk:Theoretically speaking...: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→I've been thinking about a few of these before I read this: new section) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*I disagree, Dark type is a misnomer. They fight with underhanded tactics and stuff, and so are the counterpart of the fighting type, but are not the embodiment of "dark energy".[[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 22:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | *I disagree, Dark type is a misnomer. They fight with underhanded tactics and stuff, and so are the counterpart of the fighting type, but are not the embodiment of "dark energy".[[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 22:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Forums.--'''[[User:Immewnity|<span style="color:#88AADD">''immewnity''</span>]][[User talk:Immewnity|the]][[Special:Contributions/Immewnity|mew]]''' 23:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | :Forums.--'''[[User:Immewnity|<span style="color:#88AADD">''immewnity''</span>]][[User talk:Immewnity|the]][[Special:Contributions/Immewnity|mew]]''' 23:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== I've been thinking about a few of these before I read this == | |||
Nice to know people think how I do ^^--[[User:Darknesslover5000|Darknesslover5000]] 00:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |