Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Swagmander (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=The reason why there isn't 650?= Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've g...") |
Swagmander (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=The reason why there | =The reason why there aren't 650?= | ||
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some. | Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 9 February 2011
The reason why there aren't 650?
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- Swagmander 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
