User talk:Immewnity: Difference between revisions
m (they always get subst on all three places: pedia, archives, and news) |
m (→They weren't down: new section) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Agreed. Thanks for the Bulbanews tips, plus I thought we could mention that they mis-titled it, more of a giveaway that it was fake.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|a.k.a.]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' 00:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | :Agreed. Thanks for the Bulbanews tips, plus I thought we could mention that they mis-titled it, more of a giveaway that it was fake.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|a.k.a.]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' 00:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I wouldn't say their translation was inaccurate; it's just ''different''. --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 17:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ::I wouldn't say their translation was inaccurate; it's just ''different''. --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 17:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== They weren't down == | |||
Technically, some people had some things some of the time. I personally had news and archives most of the time, and the wiki was going on and off. Some people only had the wiki, while others had nothing at all. Just to let you know what was happening. [[User:Maverick Nate|Maverick Nate]] 14:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:07, 16 January 2009
Can you please not move draft articles to the mainspace? As you can see, I deleted the last article because it wasn't relevant to us, but it had already been moved to the mainspace, had a forum post made by Bulbabot, etc. The drafts are there so admins can move them. Thanks. --Argy 15:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, you guys should figure out a way to make it that only admins can do it!--Mew a.k.a. Prmatt11 15:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
You can now simply insert {{subst:Welcome}} into a new user's talk page, and it will display a customized version of this. --Argy 16:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I reverted your edits because they weren't necessary. The other site's title translation is irrelevant since it's not official, and it's implied already that the episodes will confirm or refute the rumors. Also, don't use first- (us, we, me) or second-person (you), please. --Argy 20:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Thanks for the Bulbanews tips, plus I thought we could mention that they mis-titled it, more of a giveaway that it was fake.--Mew a.k.a. Prmatt11 00:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say their translation was inaccurate; it's just different. --Argy 17:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
They weren't down
Technically, some people had some things some of the time. I personally had news and archives most of the time, and the wiki was going on and off. Some people only had the wiki, while others had nothing at all. Just to let you know what was happening. Maverick Nate 14:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)