Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Crimsonnavy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". | Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | ||
Revision as of 00:56, 10 February 2011
The reason why there aren't 650?
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- Swagmander 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". - unsigned comment from Arkeon (talk • contribs)
