9
edits
Talk:On the Origin of Species: Mew: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Talk:On the Origin of Species: Mew (view source)
Revision as of 08:25, 5 October 2010
, 5 October 2010→Actually, it is implied that all Pokemon are the same species
Shadowater (talk | contribs) (Actually, it is implied that all Pokemon are the same species) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Barring Oddish, well, you could, through breeding and leaving out ditto, connect all gendered, non legendaries to each other. So Mew containing the DNA of all accessable Pokemon (Arceus is not accessable) isn't that Farfetch'd (pardon the pun). With ditto in the mix, all Pokemon other than legendaries are connected, and legendaries may merely require specific breeding conditions. So all Pokemon being subspecies of the... Let's say Pokemon Pokemon Species because I'm lazy may not be that out there --[[User:Shadowater|Shadowater]] 05:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | Barring Oddish, well, you could, through breeding and leaving out ditto, connect all gendered, non legendaries to each other. So Mew containing the DNA of all accessable Pokemon (Arceus is not accessable) isn't that Farfetch'd (pardon the pun). With ditto in the mix, all Pokemon other than legendaries are connected, and legendaries may merely require specific breeding conditions. So all Pokemon being subspecies of the... Let's say Pokemon Pokemon Species because I'm lazy may not be that out there --[[User:Shadowater|Shadowater]] 05:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Was it implied somewhere that humans and pokemon are related? I seem to recall that it was. [[User:PLA|PLA]] 08:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
